Adam Jewell – Search & Affiliate Marketing

A recent article in the NY Times echoed my own thoughts about management & the MBA. Granted my edumacational background is in Industrial Engineering and I might go for an MBA one of these days; more for the networking and to explore some new stuff, than to be able to beat my chest and say I have an MBA.

Even in Industrial Engineering, there seemed to be quite a distinction in the approach and methodologies between solving engineering problems and business/management problems and issues. Most of my business classes were taught by the business school. Some were good and some like accounting were “educational” I guess but often times seemed to make no common sense. In a science or engineering arena, the goal was to understand how things worked and solve problems. In business, the approach was to project a certain way of thinking onto a business and the market and try to make things work the way you thought they should work – even if things obviously don’t work that way.

In science and engineering classes, problems had to be solved – you had to work hard to understand something outside of yourself. Science works the way it works and its up to you to understand it and figure it out. In business classes and accounting in particular, an artificial model of the business is developed and we then proceed to try to make reality fit in a spreadsheet. It never seemed to be like that made sense. It makes the accounting types frustrated because they can’t get reality to fit in a spreadsheet and it makes everyone else crazy because the management theory tries to make people and the things they do fit in a spreadsheet.

In a TQM class, we had to read The Goal – by Eli Goldratt. It was at that point that things started to make sense and it seemed that someone had finally recognize the connection between science and (sometimes) living and breathing organisms called businesses. Finally, a way to figure out what to do, where to focus energies, efforts and investments to push more stuff through a system by elevating the one thing (constraint) that keep the system from growing or becoming more efficient. Along with the Theory of Constraints (TOC), the idea of the Learning Organization and Systems Thinking as written about by Peter Senge in The Fifth Discipline will become more necessary.

Back when Alfred Sloan was developing management practices to streamline GM, those typical B-School types of management theories and practices helped to bring more consistency to the operation of a business and helped to fuel the Industrial Revolution. At that time, there was no Internet, advertising and marketing were targeted based on demographics and there was a clear distinction between advertising and sales.

In the past, businesses did some market research, developed products and services and then forced people to view advertising on TV, in print & via direct mail. The advertising was quite separate from the sales process. You couldn’t click on your TV or newspaper and make a purchase. You also really had no idea how most of your advertising and marketing dollars were performing. If overall sales went up, you probably spent more. If they went down you spent less.

As the Internet continues to grow and even before it took off, some of the most successful business leaders like Bill Gates didn’t get MBAs or graduate from business school. Now that the torch is being passed to Google and Google charges ahead on its way to being the most valuable company in the world, it is again non-MBA/B-school types that are leading the charge.

Google makes virtually all of its money from selling text ads targeted to people when they are actively looking for something. They’ve turned advertising and marketing upside down and given most business people big headaches. In order to succeed, businesses now have to understand how their customers think and cater to them instead of trying to make the market buy things the way the business thinks they should be bought. Big traditional agencies are stumbling and so are big businesses themselves. The good ol’ boys still think, why would I want to target people who are looking for what I have to sell them when I can just market to the average person who buys my stuff through demographic targeting? Maybe they think if they can just keep the status quo until retirement in a few years, they won’t have to face the new business reality. Good luck with that!

While business fundamentals like organizational skills, project management, finance and accounting are still vital to a business; they need to be adapted to the new marketplace. How can you teach the realities of the new marketplace in a business school or any school? In my opinion you can’t. People either “grok” the new business reality or they don’t. The successful organizations of the future are more likely to be led by those that can bridge the gap between technology and understanding consumers and interpreting statistics & web analytics.

So just how do we train the business leaders of tomorrow & how will business school programs evolve to the new realities of the marketplace? Could technology evolve far enough to handle marketing and sales to individuals online and enable the status quo to remain in place? Will tomorrow’s business leaders even need to go to business school or will they grow up with an intuitive sense of the opportunities the web presents and naturally just get it. One thing is for sure. There are plenty of web savvy marketers working their way up some really large organizations who know that their companies don’t get the web. In 5-10 years (maybe sooner) these people will start to get more senior positions, become some of the most valuable execs in their organizations and the business world will undergo an even more rapid evolution.